ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Understanding
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Police interactions with persons experiencing mental health crisis (PiC) carry the potential for escalation. In this brief research report, we present a case study of such an encounter, examining videographic data of a widely circulated clip. The analysis follows a system-theoretical understanding of communication as a sequence of connective operations and uses the concept of turning points to identify structurally significant shifts in the interaction. The results indicate that escalation in the present example is primarily a result of communicative connection problems due to situationally divergent frames of reference and dynamic spatial compression. To stimulate practice-oriented takeaways from this analysis, we draw on the Constraints-Led Approach (CLA) as a conceptual lens for considering how these interaction problems might inform representative training design. The report thus provides both scientific insights into the structure of police interactions with PiC as well as practice-relevant impulses for the design of case-based police education and training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.