ReviewJournal of ultrasonography2026
Ultrasound evaluation of the ulnar nerve in cubital tunnel syndrome: anatomy, normal and abnormal findings, and postoperative aspects.
Review in Journal of ultrasonography, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cubital tunnel syndrome is the second most common compressive neuropathy of the upper limb after carpal tunnel syndrome and results from entrapment of the ulnar nerve around the elbow. High-resolution ultrasound has become a central diagnostic modality because of its excellent spatial resolution, capacity for dynamic assessment, and broad availability in clinical practice. This review offers an integrated and updated overview of the ultrasonographic evaluation of the ulnar nerve in cubital tunnel syndrome, detailing relevant anatomy, characteristic normal and pathological appearances, and key considerations in postoperative follow-up. The ulnar nerve may be compressed at several anatomical sites, including the arcade of Struthers, the retrocondylar groove, Osborne's ligament within the cubital tunnel, and the aponeurosis between the two heads of the flexor carpi ulnaris. Typical sonographic abnormalities include focal or segmental nerve enlargement, disruption or loss of the normal fascicular architecture, and changes in echogenicity. Dynamic maneuvers during ultrasound examination can further identify nerve subluxation, dislocation, or snapping over the medial epicondyle, all of which may contribute to clinical symptoms. Postoperative ultrasound evaluation is increasingly important for detecting complications or persistent compression following in-situ decompression, medial epicondylectomy, or anterior transposition. A standardized and reproducible ultrasound protocol is therefore essential for accurate diagnosis, appropriate management, and follow-up. Radiologists play a pivotal role in this multidisciplinary approach by providing detailed imaging assessments that guide surgical decision-making and help optimize patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.