Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41924316›Full record

ArticlePNAS nexus2026

Mental health impact of intragroup vs. intergroup wartime violence.

Joan Barceló, Keshana Ratnasingham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PNAS nexus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Joan BarcelóSocial Science Division, New York University Abu Dhabi, Saadiyat Island, Abu Dhabi 129188, United Arab Emirates.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6965-4342
Keshana RatnasinghamSocial Science Division, New York University Abu Dhabi, Saadiyat Island, Abu Dhabi 129188, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exposure to political violence has well-documented consequences for psychological well-being. Yet, most research emphasizes the consequences of intergroup conflict and overlooks that of intragroup violence. Using survey data from Tamil civilians in postwar Sri Lanka, we compare the mental health outcomes of those exposed to violence perpetrated by ethnic outgroups (intergroup violence) and those exposed to violence by members of their own ethnic group (intragroup violence). Results show that both forms of violence increase posttraumatic stress disorder, but the impact of intragroup violence is nearly four times larger. In contrast, intergroup violence is positively associated with posttraumatic growth), while intragroup violence is not. These findings highlight the need to consider the source of violence in designing postconflict mental health interventions.

Indexed as

civil warposttraumatic growthPTSDSri Lankawartime violence

Identifiers

PMID41924316
PMCPMC13036719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.