ArticleJournal of the Endocrine Society2026
Comprehensive genetic rescreening improves diagnostic yield in congenital hyperinsulinism.
Article in Journal of the Endocrine Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comprehensive genetic rescreening improves diagnostic yield in congenital hyperinsulinism.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Context: Recent genetic discoveries in congenital hyperinsulinism (HI) and advances in sequencing technology suggest that the diagnostic yield may be improved by rescreening in people with genetically unsolved HI. Objective: To evaluate this hypothesis in a nationwide cohort of individuals with a historical diagnosis of HI of unknown genetic cause. Methods: Twenty-seven probands, representing 77% of the genetically unsolved HI cases in Finland, underwent rescreening which targeted the coding regions of 18 known HI genes, and 5 relevant non-coding regions. The median age of the cohort was 21 years (range, 4-44 years). Participants had previously undergone a median of 3 genetic tests (range, 1-4), all of which yielded negative ( Results: Genetic rescreening was informative in 22% (6 of 27) of cases. Definitive genetic diagnoses were established in 4 (15%) participants. These included the detection of non-coding variants in the Conclusion: In this Finnish cohort, rescreening with a comprehensive gene panel provided new or revised diagnoses in 22% of cases, informing on medical management and recurrence risk. These findings emphasize the importance of regularly updating genetic testing strategies and highlight the clinical value of re-evaluating the need for rescreening in genetically unexplained HI cases even following clinical remission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.