Observational studySultan Qaboos University medical journal2026
Complications and Outcomes of Orbital Fracture Repair in Oman.
Observational study in Sultan Qaboos University medical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to investigate and analyse the complications and outcomes of orbital fracture repair in Oman. Methods: This multicentre retrospective study included all patients with orbital floor and/or medial wall fractures who underwent orbital reconstruction at four tertiary hospitals in Oman between January 2014 and December 2021. The data collected included demographics, fracture aetiology, surgical approach, reconstruction material, complications and repair outcomes. Results: A total of 41 patients were included in this study. Motor vehicle collisions (MVCs) were the most common cause of orbital fractures, accounting for (53.7%) of the patients. Isolated orbital fractures were encountered in 25 patients, 12 patients had orbital fractures associated with the zygomaticomaxillary complex and 4 had fractures associated with naso-orbital ethmoidal fractures. The transconjunctival approach was the most common surgical method (36.6%), followed by the infraorbital approach (24.4%). Titanium mesh was the primary implant material used in (63.4%) of the cases. The most common complications at 2-weeks to 3-months postoperatively were enophthalmos (17.1%) and residual diplopia (13%). Beyond 3 months postoperatively, complications occurred in 10 patients, resulting in an overall complication rate of (24.4%). Analysis of 24 postoperative computed tomography scans revealed that the ideal implant positioning in the anterior, middle and posterior zones was achieved in (87.5%), (45.8%) and (12.5%) of the cases, respectively. Conclusion: The study findings showed that MVCs were the primary cause of orbital fractures in Oman. The complication rate of orbital reconstruction was low and comparable to that reported in the published literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.