Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41924190›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of population data science2026

Adjusting for confounding in population administrative data when confounders are only measured in a linked cohort.

Richard J Silverwood, Gergő Baranyi, Lisa Calderwood, Bianca L De Stavola, George B Ploubidis, Ian R White, Katie Harron

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of population data science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Richard J SilverwoodCentre for Longitudinal Studies, UCL Social Research Institute, University College London, 20 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AL, United Kingdom.
Gergő BaranyiCentre for Longitudinal Studies, UCL Social Research Institute, University College London, 20 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AL, United Kingdom.
Lisa CalderwoodCentre for Longitudinal Studies, UCL Social Research Institute, University College London, 20 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AL, United Kingdom.
Bianca L De StavolaPopulation, Policy & Practice Research and Teaching Department, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London WC1N 1EH, United Kingdom.
George B PloubidisCentre for Longitudinal Studies, UCL Social Research Institute, University College London, 20 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AL, United Kingdom.
Ian R WhiteMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, University College London, 90 High Holborn, London, WC1V 6LJ, United Kingdom.
Katie HarronPopulation, Policy & Practice Research and Teaching Department, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London WC1N 1EH, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Analyses of population administrative data can often only be minimally adjusted due to a lack of control variables, potentially leading to bias due to residual confounding. Objectives: We aimed to use linked cohort data to help address residual confounding in analyses of population administrative data. One particular aim was to explore strategies for when linked cohort and population administrative data cannot be accessed together in the same environment (are "siloed"). Methods: We propose a multiple imputation-based approach, introduced through application to simulated data in three different scenarios related to the structure of the datasets. We then apply this approach to a real-world example - examining the association between pupil mobility (changing schools at non-standard times) and Key Stage 2 (age 11) attainment using data from the UK National Pupil Database (NPD). The limited control variables available in the NPD are supplemented by multiple measures of socioeconomic deprivation captured in linked Millennium Cohort Study (MCS) data. Results: In our real-world example, we included 509,670 individuals in the population NPD data, of whom 7,768 (1.5%) were MCS cohort members. The unadjusted estimate of -1.86 (95% CI -1.92, -1.81) for the association between pupil mobility and Key Stage 2 attainment was attenuated to -0.92 (95% CI -0.97, -0.88) through adjustment for the NPD control variables, and further attenuated to -0.76 (95% CI -0.86, -0.67) through adjustment for the MCS control variables. Conclusions: Linked cohort data can be used to address residual confounding in analyses of population administrative data, and our proposed approach performed well across a range of simulated and real-world scenarios. The underlying principles are widely applicable: any analysis of administrative data could potentially be strengthened by linking a subset of individuals into richer cohort data. More research is required to understand how these methods can be applied more broadly.

Indexed as

Confounding Factors, EpidemiologicChildCohort StudiesDatabases, FactualHumansUnited Kingdomcohort dataconfoundingmethodologymultiple imputationpopulation administrative data

Identifiers

PMID41924190
PMCPMC13036587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.