ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026
Planning and delivering co-creation workshops: practical lessons from digital health device design.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Co-creation methods are increasingly recognised as essential in digital health and care, yet engineers and physical scientists new to the field often find the literature highly theoretical, fragmented, and difficult to apply in practice. This paper presents a worked example of planning and delivering co-creation workshops through the development of an overactive bladder treatment device. Drawing on established participatory design frameworks, we situate our approach within existing theory while providing a modular toolkit structured around purpose (Why), content (What), and delivery (How). The toolkit is not intended as a new theoretical contribution, but as an accessible starting point for engineers and researchers seeking to integrate stakeholder engagement into biomedical device development. We also describe the use of an electronic whiteboard environment for rapid data capture and organization, reducing the need for full transcription and supporting efficient translation of stakeholder input into actionable design insights. By illustrating the process end-to-end and aligning it with key principles from the co-design literature, this paper provides early-career researchers and engineers with a concise, practice-oriented reference for running effective co-creation activities in digital health and care contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.