Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41924179›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026

Implementing AI innovation in radiology departments in the English NHS: a qualitative study on the experiences of professionals, patient groups and innovators.

Charitini Stavropoulou, Harry Scarbrough, Janette Rawlinson, Menghan Cui, David Baldwin, Nick Woznitza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Charitini StavropoulouSchool of Health and Medical Sciences, City St George's University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Harry ScarbroughCentre for Health and Care Innovation Research, City St George's University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Janette RawlinsonUK Lung Cancer and Mesothelioma Clinical Expert Group, Sandwell, United Kingdom.
Menghan CuiUCL School of Management, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
David BaldwinRespiratory Medicine Unit, David Evans Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Nick WoznitzaUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Digital solutions and Artificial Intelligence (AI) innovations are often presented as the answer to many challenges faced by healthcare systems around the world. The UK government has made significant investments in this area, yet there have been concerns about the challenges faced when these technologies are implemented in practice. The aim of this study was to explore the perceptions and experiences of professionals, patient groups as well as innovators of introducing a new AI innovation used to detect potential abnormalities for lung cancer in radiology departments in the English NHS and to investigate the implementation challenges from their perspectives. Methods: Between September 2022 and January 2024, we visited five sites and conducted 34 interviews with radiologists, radiographers and other professionals involved in the implementation of the tool. We also interviewed seven staff from the company who developed and implemented the tool. In addition, three 2-hour focus group workshops, two online and one in person, were conducted in January 2024 with a total of 14 patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) participants from diverse regions, backgrounds and lived experience across England. Following initial coding done inductively, the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was applied as an organising framework to structure and interpret the emerging themes. Results: Both professional and PPIE groups recognised the potential of AI in the diagnostic pathway, while generally seeing it as a supportive second pair of eyes rather than an autonomous decision-maker, particularly when delivering sensitive news and information. Professionals' acceptance depended on how the tool was integrated into existing workflows and its perceived value, with triaging functionality seen as effective, but varying in usefulness depending on local workload pressures. Innovators as well healthcare professionals highlighted a number of implementation challenges, particularly around fragmented legal and regulatory frameworks and unclear governance within the NHS. Discussion: Our findings underscore that successful AI implementation in clinical practice depends not on the technology alone but on its effective integration into existing healthcare contexts and alignment with the beliefs and needs of healthcare professionals, patients and the public.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceimplementationlung cancerNHSradiology

Identifiers

PMID41924179
PMCPMC13036200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.