ReviewInfection and drug resistance2026
Current Evidence on Voriconazole Exposure and Individualized Therapy for Aspergillosis.
Review in Infection and drug resistance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular Mechanisms, Diagnosis, and Therapeutic Strategies of Antifungal Resistance in Filamentous Fungi.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Research trends in COPD-associated invasive pulmonary aspergillosis over the past two decades: a bibliometric and topic modelling analysis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With emerging global antifungal resistance, voriconazole is a preferred first-line antifungal agent for the treatment of aspergillosis, and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is frequently utilized during therapy. This review examines evidence from international guidelines, clinical studies, case reports, and population pharmacokinetic analyses to investigate the multifactorial drivers influencing voriconazole therapy. Current guidelines demonstrate variability in recommended target trough concentrations, though a range of 1.0-5.5 mg/L appears as a frequently cited reference interval; however, these recommendations are often derived from heterogeneous populations rather than being specific to aspergillosis. Plasma voriconazole concentration alone may not fully account for the variability in clinical outcomes. Efficacy and safety are influenced by multiple factors, including CYP2C19 polymorphisms, disease severity, host immune status, and infection site. Consequently, the interpretation of a single concentration threshold may be limited. A multidimensional approach-considering genotype, host factors, inflammatory status, and dynamic clinical context-is a component of individualized therapy for characterizing treatment response and toxicity risk. Within this framework, TDM is an established tool for assessing systemic exposure, and its integration with clinical and biological information is relevant for clinical assessment. Altogether, these observations underscore the value of integrated clinical assessment while identifying remaining evidence gaps for further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.