ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Upadacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis: progress and challenges.
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Smart Polymer Nanoparticles: Targeting Macrophages/Fibroblasts and Modulating the Microenvironment for Rheumatoid Arthritis Therapy.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by progressive joint destruction and systemic inflammation, imposing a substantial global health burden, with an estimated 31.7 million cases projected by 2050. Despite advances in therapy, limitations of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) and biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) persist, including adverse effects, high costs, and inadequate responses in certain patient subgroups. Upadacitinib (UPA), a selective Janus kinase (JAK) 1 inhibitor, represents a breakthrough in targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs), offering rapid symptom relief and structural preservation. Clinical trials, including the SELECT-COMPARE study, have demonstrated that UPA outperforms adalimumab in achieving higher 12-week American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 (71% vs. 63%), ACR50 (45% vs. 29%), and ACR70 responses, with sustained efficacy extending beyond 5 years. Real-world evidence from the Canadian post-marketing observational CLOSE-UP study corroborated these findings, showing that 63.5% of patients achieved DAS28-CRP ≤2.6 at 6 months. Compared with pan-JAK inhibitors such as tofacitinib, the JAK1 selectivity of UPA may reduce off-target effects; however, safety concerns remain, including an increased risk of herpes zoster (particularly in Asian populations), liver enzyme abnormalities, and potential cardiovascular events. Cost remains a major barrier, with annual expenses exceeding USD 60,000 for uninsured patients, although partially alleviated by insurance coverage. Future directions highlight combination strategies, personalized treatment approaches, and broader applications in psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis. While UPA enhances RA management through its oral convenience and robust efficacy, addressing long-term safety monitoring, affordability, and mechanisms underlying refractory RA remains imperative for optimizing global patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.