ArticleJournal of pain research2026
Machine Learning Approach to Predict Postoperative Pain and Opioid Usage in Elective Primary Spine Surgery: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Explainable artificial intelligence for postoperative analgesia risk stratification and clinical decision support in abdominal surgery.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Machine learning (ML) was used to predict pain scores and opioid consumption after elective spine surgery in the presence and absence of erector spinae plane block (ESP). Methods: A single-center retrospective chart review of 2796 cases was conducted. These cases were divided into the control group (N=1255) consisting of patients who did not receive the ESP blocks and the treatment group consisting of patients who received the blocks (N=1541). The gradient boosting ensemble tree methodology was employed to develop the AI predictive models. Feature importance for each optimized gradient boosting model was quantified using impurity-based importance scores, as implemented in the scikit-learn library. Partial dependence analysis was conducted to characterize the direction, magnitude, and non-linear nature of predictor-outcome relationships across clinically relevant ranges. Results: On unadjusted univariate analysis, the ESP block was associated with a statistically significant (p=0.01) yet clinically irrelevant 1% increase in average postsurgical pain scores. Conversely, ESP block was associated with a statistically non-significant (p=0.13) but clinically relevant 6.7% reduction in opioid consumption (MME/kg/day). These associations are exploratory and should not be interpreted as causal. Three AI models were developed to predict postsurgical pain and opioid consumption. The best-performing model, which predicts average postsurgical pain, achieved a mean absolute error of 1.24 on a 10-point scale (approximately 12.4%). High-importance predictors across the models included preoperative pain scores, serum glucose, and white blood cell count, as well as age. Conclusion: It is feasible to use machine-learning approaches to identify risk factors for postoperative pain and predict population-level pain scores and opioid consumption in spine surgery using large datasets; these models are not intended for individual-level prediction. The role of ESP in spine surgery, however, remains uncertain, and ESP block findings should be interpreted as exploratory associations only.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.