ReviewJournal of pain research2026
Application of Intelligent Neonatal Pain Assessment Tools Based on Multimodal Data Fusion: A Systematic Review.
Review in Journal of pain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Effective neonatal pain assessment is crucial for optimal analgesic management; however, it remains challenging, as traditional pain scales and single-modal intelligent assessment approaches continue to face substantial methodological and clinical limitations. Intelligent systems integrating multimodal data offer promising alternatives for enhancing objectivity and continuity of assessment. This systematic review aimed to identify, evaluate, and synthesize current intelligent neonatal pain assessment methods based on multimodal data fusion. Methods: Two investigators independently searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases for relevant studies published up to September 12, 2025. Studies reporting the use of a multimodal approach to neonatal pain assessment were included. The methodological quality of the selected studies was independently assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS)-2. A systematic review of the findings was then conducted. Results: Nine studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. Seven studies compared the accuracy of single-modal versus multimodal assessments of neonatal pain, with five also reporting the Area Under the Curve (AUC) values. All studies demonstrated that multimodal approaches achieved higher accuracy than single-modal methods. Specifically, 77.78% (7/9) of the studies successfully assessed pain intensity and distinguished between neonates with and without pain. However, only 44.44% (4/9) addressed methods for handling missing data, and merely 33.33% (3/9) utilized external validation sets. Conclusion: Multimodal pain assessment demonstrates superior accuracy in neonatal pain evaluation. However, the heterogeneity in modalities, outcome indicators, and performance statistics across existing studies limits the ability to identify an optimal combination of modalities. Further research focusing on standardization, clinical applicability, and robust validation is required to strengthen the evidence base in this field and facilitate clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.