ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Methodological strategies for linking superordinate life goals (values) and daily activities: a cross-sectional online study of adolescents.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adolescents pursue life goals through daily activities that pave the way toward a future or ideal self. Very little is known, however, regarding what youth consider to be important activities in support of their life goals. In the present study, we examined four psychometric methods of weighting and rank ordering activities associated with six life goals (Fitness, Helpful, Smart, Talented, Creative, and Social). Cross-sectional data were obtained from an online survey of 2,001 youth ages 13 to 15 who picked a life goal and then rated whether 21 activities align with their life goal. Eleven of the activities for each goal were selected by ChatGPT and mixed with 10 filler activities (drawn from the remaining life goals). Four weighting methods including an ipsative distribution-based approach, confirmatory factor analysis, item response theory, and multidimensional scaling were used to rank order activities. The distribution method produced upper quartiles based on standard deviation width. Select activities were relatively concordant for six life goals using the four methods, underscoring the uniformity and convergence of these different approaches. All four methods provided evidence of the uniformity of the select 11 activities. Findings are discussed in terms of the composition of adolescent life goals, their rank-order consistency across different weighting schemes, and their conceptual importance as we learn more about what youth consider relevant activities as they pursue their life goals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.