Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41924067›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychology2026

Neuropragmatics: from classical pragmatics to neurocognitive models of pragmatics in dialogue.

Angélica Gutiérrez Cisneros, Alice Foucart, Angèle Brunellière

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Angélica Gutiérrez CisnerosUniv. Lille, CNRS, UMR 9193 - SCALab - Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives, F-59000, Lille, France.
Alice FoucartCentro de Investigación Nebrija en Cognición (CINC) & Facultad de Lenguas y Educación, Universidad Antonio de Nebrija, Madrid, Spain.
Angèle BrunellièreUniv. Lille, CNRS, UMR 9193 - SCALab - Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives, F-59000, Lille, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past 30 years, there has been significant development in the understanding of the brain mechanisms underlying pragmatic processing. The primary purpose of the present review is to delve into the origins of neuropragmatics, defined as the study of the neural basis of pragmatic processing, tracing its development from the foundations of traditional pragmatics. Moreover, this review aims to deepen the understanding of the cognitive and neural mechanisms underlying pragmatic processing. Throughout this review, the topic of neuropragmatics is addressed through diverse theoretical frameworks modeling how the pragmatic information is treated. Then, the neural substrates and neurophysiological correlates of pragmatic processing are outlined, with particular interest in the study of speech acts which emerged more recently at the brain level. Lastly, we discuss promising directions to address the questions that remain unresolved in the field of neuropragmatics, which have huge impacts on methodological and societal aspects.

Indexed as

cognitive approachneural substratesneurocognitive modelsneuropragmaticsspeech actstemporal dynamics

Identifiers

PMID41924067
PMCPMC13037490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.