ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Academic discipline and university students' well-being: a comparative analysis with implications for physical and psychological health promotion strategies.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The university years represent a formative period for establishing health behaviors and psychological resources. While existing research often examines individual predictors of student well-being, few studies have explored how academic discipline shapes these patterns. The present study aimed to examine differences in physical activity (PA), self-esteem, resilience, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and negative psychological outcomes (anxiety, stress, and depression) among Chinese undergraduates according to academic discipline. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted in December 2024 among 1,560 students from six comprehensive universities in China. Participants were categorized into four academic disciplines: physical education (PE), health sciences (HS), education sciences (ES) and other non-health sciences (ONS). Validated instruments were used to assess PA, self-esteem, resilience, HRQoL and negative psychological symptoms. Results: Significant differences were observed between academic disciplines. PE students reported the highest scores for PA engagement, self-esteem, resilience and HRQoL, along with the lowest scores for anxiety and stress. In contrast, ES and ONS students reported higher levels of anxiety, stress and depression, as well as lower self-esteem, resilience and HRQoL. Further analyses revealed that male students, those with higher perceived socioeconomic status (PSES) and those with higher PA levels demonstrated more favorable psychological profiles. Conclusion: Academic discipline, alongside demographic and behavioral factors, plays a key role in shaping students' psychological health and lifestyle behaviors. University-based health promotion strategies should incorporate academic discipline and prioritize action-based interventions to foster sustainable well-being across diverse student populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.