ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
Plastic brain mechanisms supporting reduction in cravings induced by response training.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent evidence indicates that interventions involving the repeated inhibition of motor responses to environmental cues reduce brain reward responses and craving for these cues, and in turn their consumption. Such approaches have been put forward as a promising solution to unhealthy food overconsumption. Yet, the neurocognitive mechanisms underlying inhibition training to reduce reward responses remain largely unknown. We addressed those questions in a within-participant pre-post intervention study examining how target stimuli (Go)/non-target stimuli (NoGo) training reduces implicit motivational and electrophysiological activity to trained sugary drink cues. We then examined whether computational indices of Pavlovian and other reinforcement learning biases moderate the efficacy of the training, to test how inhibition training involves learning mechanisms. In addition to replicating evidence for a reduction in explicit cue valuation with Go/NoGo training, our results identified the N2 event-related potentials (ERP) component as modulated by the training, and individual Pavlovian biases as moderators of training efficacy. These findings point to inhibitory control and associative devaluation as the neurophysiological mechanisms supporting the effect of Go/NoGo training on cue valuation, and a contribution of Pavlovian learning in these processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.