ArticleJournal of medical education and curricular development
Interprofessional Collaboration and Education in Hospital Settings: An Ethnographic Study.
Article in Journal of medical education and curricular development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Interprofessional collaboration (IPC) and interprofessional education (IPE) are widely recognised as essential for improving teamwork and reducing medical errors. However, despite their importance, implementing IPC and IPE in hospital settings remains challenging, and little is known about how they are understood and enacted in everyday clinical practice. This study explores how healthcare professionals perceive IPC and IPE within a diverse hospital environment and how these practices unfold in routine clinical work. Methods: An ethnographic design was employed, incorporating field observations, shadowing of healthcare staff, and semi-structured interviews with a range of healthcare professionals. The data were analysed collaboratively and iteratively to identify key themes relating to IPC and IPE in daily clinical work. Results: The data analysis revealed three interrelated themes directly affecting IPC and IPE: commitment, skills and competencies, and environmental factors. Commitment was strongly influenced by shared professional experiences, which led to improved team cohesion, a better working atmosphere, and enhanced motivation. Competencies such as communication, respect, leadership, and emotional/moral qualities, such as humility, were identified as critical in translating commitment into practice. Environmental factors, including financial constraints, workload, and inadequate resources can hinder IPC, while IPE programs, empowering nurses, and small, cohesive units were identified as facilitators. Conclusions: The study contributes to a deeper understanding of IPC and IPE in everyday healthcare clinical settings, highlighting the critical role that both human and structural factors play in improving patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.