Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41923967›Full record

ArticleSkin health and disease2026

Teleconsultations for Eczema in CHildren (TECH) feasibility study: a mixed-methods study with adolescents and parents.

Natalie King Stokes, Aoife Daly, Sarah McCusker, Manrup Hunjan, Ellen Vincent, Ashima Lowe, Carolyn Charman, Jonathan Mathers, Lea Solman, Susannah George and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Skin health and disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Natalie King StokesCentre of Evidence Based Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0318-4813
Aoife DalyDepartment of Dermatology, Belfast Health & Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK.
Sarah McCuskerDepartment of Dermatology, Royal Hospital for Children, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK.
Manrup HunjanDepartment of Dermatology, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Ellen VincentPatient co-Applicant.
Ashima LoweDepartment of Dermatology, Swansea Bay University Health Board, Swansea, UK.
Carolyn CharmanDepartment of Dermatology, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK.
Jonathan MathersApplied Health Sciences, School of Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Lea SolmanDepartment of Dermatology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Susannah GeorgeDepartment of Dermatology, Brighton General Hospital, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, East Sussex, UK.
Esther Burden-TehCentre of Evidence Based Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0033-2836

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Teleconsultations form a key component of the National Health Service's Long Term Plan, outpatient recovery and -transformation, and commitment to net zero. There is currently little evidence to inform their delivery within paediatric dermatology, a specialty that is increasingly difficult to access. Teleconsultations may offer convenience and widen access for patients, particularly for follow-up of chronic conditions such as eczema. Objectives: To explore patients' and parents' experiences and perceptions of teleconsultations for follow-up of eczema in secondary or tertiary care; to identify components of acceptability of different consultation types and explore how teleconsultations could be optimized; and to obtain views of a potential trial comparing face-to-face appointments with teleconsultations for paediatric eczema follow-up. Methods: A mixed-methods study comprising an online survey and qualitative interviews with patients and parents of children with eczema, who had experience of teleconsultations under secondary or tertiary care, was carried out. An online survey was completed by eligible adolescents and parents. The results informed subsequent semi-structured interviews, conducted with patients and parents, and responses were analysed thematically using framework analysis. Results: Survey responses from 31 parents and 20 adolescents were analysed. Overall, 41% were 'satisfied or very satisfied' following telephone appointments vs. 71% for video and 40% for online or mobile messaging. Preferred consultation type was face-to-face in 67%, with 31% preferring a combination of face-to-face and teleconsultations. Some 41% of participants were interested in participating in a trial comparing face-to-face and teleconsultations for eczema follow-up. Qualitative interviews were conducted with 10 parents and 2 adolescents. Six overarching themes were constructed from the interview data: the value of a dermatology appointment, what is important in an eczema consultation, concerns about patient assessment, complexity of acceptability, patient choice and optimizing teleconsultations. Conclusions: While there was a preference for face-to-face consultations, teleconsultations were acceptable in certain situations, such as for stable eczema or to avoid missing school. Patient perspectives of how teleconsultations could be improved include sending photographs before the appointment and clinician training. This study suggests that directly comparing face-to-face appointments with teleconsultations in a future trial is unlikely to be feasible. A hybrid intervention combining face-to-face and teleconsultation would be more acceptable to patients and parents.

Identifiers

PMID41923967
PMCPMC13036726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.