ArticleACS applied engineering materials2026
Predicting and Improving the Mechanical Strength of Outer-Skinned Hollow Fiber Membranes.
Article in ACS applied engineering materials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pressure-driven hollow fiber (HF) membranes are often operated with the feed on the outside of the HF. In such a configuration, it is important to know the limits of the external pressure that can be applied to the membrane. Therefore, we investigated whether a model for predicting the collapse pressure of isotropic thin-walled cylinders was able to accurately predict the collapse pressure of outer-skinned HF membranes. Theoretical derivations showed that collapse can occur due to plastic or elastic failure, where, in the case of plastic failure, the collapse pressure should equal that of the burst pressure. Combining experimental results with our model revealed that for our membranes, plastic failure was the dominant failure mechanism. The model was able to accurately predict the influence of the membrane's porosity on the collapse pressure. However, the model seemed to only partially predict the influence of different geometric dimensions of the HF on its collapse pressure. Interestingly, though, the results showed that, for 7 out of 8 HF membranes, the burst pressure was indeed similar to the collapse pressure, highlighting that the burst pressure can be used as an indicator for the collapse pressure of the outer-skinned HF membranes. This is an important finding for the field of HF membranes, as the burst pressure is much easier to experimentally determine than the collapse pressure. Additionally, the model provides a clear direction to further improve the collapse pressure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.