ArticleInternational journal of population data science2025
Discussing Data: A UK-wide public consultation on the use of low fidelity synthetic data for research.
Article in International journal of population data science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Synthetic data is an emerging tool for health and social care researchers which can be used to expedite research processes and enhance the safety of personal data handling. Although data owners across the UK and globally currently make synthetic datasets available, public awareness and perceptions of its use for research remain underexplored. Objectives: We aimed to agree a set of recommendations for data owners on producing and releasing synthetic data and communicating with the UK public about this topic. Methods: Forty-four public members were invited to four deliberative workshops to co-create a set of recommendations for data owners. Notes and transcripts from workshops 1-3, along with public member survey feedback, were reviewed to identify key topics. Results: Thirty-seven individuals contributed. We developed ten recommendations spanning five areas: introducing synthetic data; explaining its purpose; creating datasets; managing access, use, and misuse; and clear communication. These were iteratively refined with public input during the final workshop. Conclusions: This study offers a unique insight into public attitudes towards synthetic data use in health and administrative research. The recommendations developed are intended to support UK data owners in releasing synthetic data responsibly, aligning with public expectations and fostering trust in its use as a research innovation tool. Future research should continue to assess evolving public attitudes to both low and high-fidelity data as its use expands.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.