ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
Genomic selection for tar content in
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Despite its economic importance, reducing tobacco tar content remains challenging due to its complex genetic basis. Methods: Here, we evaluated 436 diverse tobacco accessions to characterize the genetic architecture of tar content and develop an optimized genomic selection strategy. Based on these findings, sixteen genomic prediction models were assessed using five-fold cross-validation. Results: Genome-wide association analysis detected no major-effect loci, and regional heritability mapping revealed localized enrichment of small-effect variants, particularly on chromosome 17, indicating a predominantly polygenic architecture. rrBLUP achieved the highest prediction accuracy (0.84) with superior computational efficiency, followed closely by GBM (0.83). The robustness of rrBLUP was further confirmed in an independent panel of 36 accessions (Pearson Discussion: Together, our results demonstrate that tobacco tar content is governed by dispersed small-effect loci with regional aggregation and establish rrBLUP as a robust and practical model for genome-wide prediction, providing methodological guidance for low-tar tobacco breeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.