Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41923904›Full record

ArticleMedical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention2026

Fetuses Made Simple: Modeling and Tracking of Fetal Shape and Pose.

Yingcheng Liu, Peiqi Wang, Sebastian Diaz, Esra Abaci Turk, Benjamin Billot, P Ellen Grant, Polina Golland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yingcheng LiuComputer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab, MIT, Cambridge, USA.
Peiqi WangComputer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab, MIT, Cambridge, USA.
Sebastian DiazComputer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab, MIT, Cambridge, USA.
Esra Abaci TurkBoston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Benjamin BillotInria, Epione team, Sophia-Antipolis, France.
P Ellen GrantBoston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Polina GollandComputer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab, MIT, Cambridge, USA.

Funding

Fetal MRI: robust self-driving brain acquisition and body movement quantificationR01EB032708 · NIBIB · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI ADALSTEINSSON, ELFAR, GRANT, PATRICIA ELLEN · 2022 to 2025
$2.8M
Developing novel MR tools to optimize surgical planning and fetal outcome in TTTSR01HD114338 · NICHD · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI ELFAR ADALSTEINSSON, Patricia Ellen Grant · 2024 to 2026
$2.2M
Bringing Coherent Fetal Brain Volumes and Automated Metrics to the Radiology WorkflowR01EB036945 · NIBIB · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI ELFAR ADALSTEINSSON, Patricia Ellen Grant · 2025 to 2026
$1.3M
Characterizing the Relationship between Uterine Activity and Placental Function Across Pregnancy with MRIR21HD106553 · NICHD · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI ABACI TURK, ESRA · 2022 to 2023
$497k
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB032708NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB036945NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD114338NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD106553
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analyzing fetal body motion and shape is paramount in prenatal diagnostics and monitoring. Existing methods for fetal MRI analysis mainly rely on anatomical keypoints or volumetric body segmentations. Keypoints simplify body structure to facilitate motion analysis, but may ignore important details of full-body shape. Body segmentations capture complete shape information but complicate temporal analysis due to large non-local fetal movements. To address these limitations, we construct a 3D articulated statistical fetal body model based on the Skinned Multi-Person Linear Model (SMPL). Our algorithm iteratively estimates body pose in the image space and body shape in the canonical pose space. This approach improves robustness to MRI motion artifacts and intensity distortions, and reduces the impact of incomplete surface observations due to challenging fetal poses. We train our model on segmentations and keypoints derived from 19, 816 MRI volumes across 53 subjects. Our model captures body shape and motion across time series and provides intuitive visualization. Furthermore, it enables automated anthropometric measurements traditionally difficult to obtain from segmentations and keypoints. When tested on unseen fetal body shapes, our method yields a surface alignment error of 3.2 mm for 3 mm MRI voxel size. To our knowledge, this represents the first 3D articulated statistical fetal body model, paving the way for enhanced fetal motion and shape analysis in prenatal diagnostics. The code is available at https://github.com/MedicalVisionGroup/fetal-smpl.

Indexed as

3D body modelFetal MRIPose estimationShape estimationSMPL (Skinned Multi-Person Linear Model)

Identifiers

PMID41923904
PMCPMC13036607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.