ArticleFrontiers in neurology
A binational study of the association between white matter hyperintensities and functional outcome in stroke patients.
Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Measures of white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) represent a crucial part of post-stroke outcome prediction. Automatic WMH segmentation has proven particularly challenging in stroke cases. Using an improved method for WMH segmentation that incorporates stroke lesions, we set out to explore factors associated with higher WMH burden, as well as the association between WMH burden and post-stroke dependency across two different countries that may demonstrate significant variation in radiological presentation. Methods: A total of 384 acute ischemic stroke (AIS) survivors from the Norwegian Cognitive Impairment After Stroke (Nor-COAST; NO) study and the Houston Methodist Registry of Neurological Endpoint Assessments among Patients with Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke (REINAH; US) database were analyzed. MRI and clinical data were collected upon acute care hospital admission. WMHs were measured automatically using the nnU-Net methodology, taking into account the acute stroke lesion. Results: No significant difference in WMH percentage was found between sites. Factors associated with higher WMH burden included only age in NO, while in US, very high age (≥ 85), smoking, and being underweight were key factors. The two sites showed significant differences in demographics and clinical characteristics: the US cohort exhibited greater racial heterogeneity, higher body mass index (BMI) with more extremely obese patients, higher National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores, and more thrombectomies, whereas the NO cohort exhibited more tobacco use, hypercholesterolemia, and longer stay at the hospital. Post-stroke dependency was initially associated with higher WMH percentage overall but only remained significant after adjusment in Norwegians aged ≥85, while in the US, dependency was driven by stroke severity and treatment after adjustment. Conclusion: Cohorts from the US and Norway exhibit no significant difference in WMH burden, but differ in the factors associated with WMHs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.