ArticleJournal of advanced veterinary and animal research2025
Comparative energy value of discarded potato chips used as feedingredient in finishing diets for lambs.
Article in Journal of advanced veterinary and animal research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To determine the comparative energy value of discarded potato chips (DPC) used as a feed ingredient, the growth performance, carcass traits, and visceral mass were evaluated in 48 lambs. Materials and Methods: Lambs (29.89 ± 2.72 kg) were used in a randomized block design (8 replicates/treatment) in a 63-day feeding trial. DPC was composed mainly of malformed potato chips, which were removed before packaging. Its chemical composition was 96.92% dry matter, 7.11% CP, 39.65% ether extract, 2.84% neutral detergent fiber, and 46.03% starch. The DPC was included at 0%, 5%, and 10% in a total mixed ration (88:12 concentrate-to-forage ratio), replacing cracked corn grain. Results: Replacing corn with DPC did not affect dry matter intake (DMI), average daily gain, and gain-to-feed ratio. The observed dietary net energy (NE) was not modified by replacing corn with DPC and was close to (0.99) the NE expected according to the diet formulation. Using the replacement technique, the estimated NE for maintenance of DPC averaged 2.37 Mcal/kg. Kidney-pelvic-heart fat (KPH) and visceral fat were increased linearly ( Conclusion: DPC included at up to a 10% level in the diet did not affect DMI, efficiency, and carcass traits but increased KPH and visceral fat. The average NE value of DPC is approximately 6.5% higher than that of cracked corn grain. However, due to its high fat content, careful consideration is necessary when formulating rations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.