ArticleInternational journal of developmental disabilities2026
'They didn't trust us to follow the rules' - a qualitative study of how Irish adults with mild and moderate intellectual disabilities experienced the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in International journal of developmental disabilities, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Research documenting the self-reported impact of COVID-19 on people with intellectual disabilities has typically focused on the experiences of people with mild intellectual disabilities living in community settings. This study aimed to explore a broader perspective by examining the lived experiences of Irish adults with mild and moderate intellectual disabilities living in both community and congregated settings during COVID-19. Methods: Twenty-six adults with intellectual disabilities, of whom 20 lived in community settings, were interviewed in-person using easy read materials. Interviews were thematically analysed using Template Analysis. Results: Five key themes were generated: (1) participants' emotional response and the impact on relationships and mental and physical health; (2) reduced community access, changed services, and uncertainty; (3) loss of autonomy, greater restrictions, and unequal treatment; (4) self-reflection and reappraising the future through the lens of COVID-19; and (5) pandemic-generated opportunities, skills development, and resources for coping. Conclusions: Despite reference to some opportunities for growth and positive changes in routine, participants predominantly highlighted the negative impact of the pandemic on their emotional lives, relationships and sense of assurance of future stability in necessary supports. Participants' experiences illustrate how the pandemic exposed the fragility of hard-fought advances in autonomy and self-determination. Greater vigilance is needed to protect a rights-based approach to support during times of emergency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.