ArticleInternational journal of developmental disabilities2026
Is everything (im)possible? Exploring the belief systems of Chinese pre-service special education teachers regarding students with moderate and severe intellectual disability.
Article in International journal of developmental disabilities, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aims to explore the belief systems of Chinese pre-service special education teachers (PSETs) regarding students with moderate to severe intellectual disability (MSID). Methods: A qualitative research design was employed. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight PSETs and analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Results: The findings revealed four key themes in PSETs' beliefs about students with MSID: educational placement, approaches to learning, priority development areas, and growth in abilities. These beliefs ranged from limiting to constructive, forming either nested or divergent belief systems. Conclusions: This study sheds light on the diverse belief systems of Chinese PSETs regarding students with MSID. The complexity of these belief systems underscores the need for targeted teacher education programs designed to foster more constructive beliefs, thereby promoting effective teaching practices and improving educational outcomes for students with MSID.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.