Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41923808›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of developmental disabilities2026

Is everything (im)possible? Exploring the belief systems of Chinese pre-service special education teachers regarding students with moderate and severe intellectual disability.

Weihao Xin, Jingwen Ye, Zhenzhen Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of developmental disabilities, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Weihao XinJing Hengyi School of Education, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.
Jingwen YeJing Hengyi School of Education, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.
Zhenzhen ZhangDepartment of Special Education, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to explore the belief systems of Chinese pre-service special education teachers (PSETs) regarding students with moderate to severe intellectual disability (MSID). Methods: A qualitative research design was employed. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight PSETs and analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Results: The findings revealed four key themes in PSETs' beliefs about students with MSID: educational placement, approaches to learning, priority development areas, and growth in abilities. These beliefs ranged from limiting to constructive, forming either nested or divergent belief systems. Conclusions: This study sheds light on the diverse belief systems of Chinese PSETs regarding students with MSID. The complexity of these belief systems underscores the need for targeted teacher education programs designed to foster more constructive beliefs, thereby promoting effective teaching practices and improving educational outcomes for students with MSID.

Indexed as

Belief systemseducational placementmoderate and severe intellectual disabilitypre-service special education teachers

Identifiers

PMID41923808
PMCPMC13037180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.