ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Negotiating responsibility: How German healthcare professionals navigate racism between recognition and resistance.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Research on everyday racism in healthcare remains limited, particularly in Germany. This study examines how healthcare professionals perceive their own conduct toward racialized healthcare users and explores the interpretive frameworks that shape these perceptions. By focusing on the everyday concepts that guide clinical encounters, the analysis highlights how racism is reproduced within healthcare interactions and offers insight into the knowledge frameworks and institutional processes that sustain inequities in care. Methods: We conducted problem-centred expert interviews with doctors, nurses, and members of the therapeutic professions (occupational therapists, physiotherapists and psychotherapists) working in hospitals and rehabilitation facilities in Germany. Participants were recruited systematically across three German states and interviews were conducted by telephone, in person or via videoconference. They explored respondents' observations of racism within their institutions, reflections on their own role in reproducing it, and their assessments of existing structures and further needs for effectively addressing racism in healthcare. Data were analyzed using the documentary method. Results: Twenty-one healthcare professionals were interviewed for this study. The analysis shows that implicit forms of racism remain pervasive, yet respondents displayed varying degrees of reflexivity and awareness about how racism is reproduced in everyday practice, including recognition of their own roles within these processes. Even participants engaged in antiracist efforts frequently relied on culturalizing discourses and essentialist explanatory models. While some respondents critically examined their own positionality and used their professional privilege to intervene in racist situations, such actions were typically Discussion: Many respondents expressed uncertainty about how to define or analyze racism, underscoring the need for a broader public dialogue on the issue. Moreover, during their training, healthcare professionals are exposed to not only the formal curriculum but also a hidden curriculum, which subtly conveys implicit lessons about professional conduct, social hierarchies, and attitudes toward racialized patient groups. Not least, the data demonstrate the lack of institutional infrastructure to support healthcare professionals commitment to dismantle racism. Because meaningful change requires structural interventions, there is a clear need for measures that enable all healthcare professionals to contribute effectively to dismantling racism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.