ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2026
Hemolysis in Pulsed Field Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Narrative Review.
Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of pulsed field ablation and very high-power short-duration ablation for atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Pulsed Field Versus Cryoballoon Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Procedural Outcomes and Hemolysis-Related Laboratory Changes in a Single-Center Pilot Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulsed field ablation (PFA) has emerged as a promising non-thermal energy source for treating atrial fibrillation (AF), demonstrating comparable efficacy to traditional thermal ablation techniques while offering an improved safety profile. However, recent evidence suggests that PFA may be associated with intravascular hemolysis, a complication that can potentially lead to acute kidney injury (AKI). This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the mechanisms of hemolysis associated with PFA and to summarize current strategies to mitigate the risk of AKI. The delivery of high-voltage electrical pulses during PFA can induce red blood cell lysis, resulting in elevated circulating free hemoglobin. The extent of hemolysis has been shown to correlate with several procedural variables, including peak output voltage, catheter-tissue contact quality, and, particularly, the number of energy applications delivered. Recent studies have highlighted that adequate preprocedural hydration may effectively reduce the incidence of AKI by promoting renal clearance of hemolytic products. Although hemolysis appears to be an unavoidable effect of pulsed field ablation, the clinical consequences associated with hemolysis, particularly AKI, can be significantly reduced with preventive measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.