Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41923751›Full record

ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2026

Hemolysis in Pulsed Field Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Narrative Review.

Angelica Cersosimo, Nicola Pierucci, Marco Valerio Mariani, Andrea Matteucci, Andrea Giovanni Parato, Vincenzo Mirco La Fazia, Andrea Natale

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Angelica CersosimoDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, "Magna Graecia" University, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8463-8412
Nicola PierucciDepartment of Cardiovascular, Respiratory, Nephrological, Anesthesiologic and Geriatric Sciences, Sapienza University, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5985-4081
Marco Valerio MarianiDepartment of Cardiovascular, Respiratory, Nephrological, Anesthesiologic and Geriatric Sciences, Sapienza University, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9480-1209
Andrea MatteucciDivision of Cardiology, San Filippo Neri Hospital, 00135 Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8831-6178
Andrea Giovanni ParatoDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, "Tor Vergata" University of Rome, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2342-0233
Vincenzo Mirco La FaziaTexas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, St David's Medical Center, Austin, TX 78705, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7548-4685
Andrea NataleDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, "Tor Vergata" University of Rome, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5487-0728

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) has emerged as a promising non-thermal energy source for treating atrial fibrillation (AF), demonstrating comparable efficacy to traditional thermal ablation techniques while offering an improved safety profile. However, recent evidence suggests that PFA may be associated with intravascular hemolysis, a complication that can potentially lead to acute kidney injury (AKI). This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the mechanisms of hemolysis associated with PFA and to summarize current strategies to mitigate the risk of AKI. The delivery of high-voltage electrical pulses during PFA can induce red blood cell lysis, resulting in elevated circulating free hemoglobin. The extent of hemolysis has been shown to correlate with several procedural variables, including peak output voltage, catheter-tissue contact quality, and, particularly, the number of energy applications delivered. Recent studies have highlighted that adequate preprocedural hydration may effectively reduce the incidence of AKI by promoting renal clearance of hemolytic products. Although hemolysis appears to be an unavoidable effect of pulsed field ablation, the clinical consequences associated with hemolysis, particularly AKI, can be significantly reduced with preventive measures.

Indexed as

acute kidney injuryatrial fibrillationhemolysispulsed field ablation

Identifiers

PMID41923751
PMCPMC13036529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.