ArticleReviews in cardiovascular medicine2026
Outcome Comparisons of Direct Coverage Versus Fenestration for an Isolated Left Vertebral Artery in Zone 2 TEVAR: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Preserve or Cover? The Isolated Left Vertebral Artery in Totally Endovascular Zone 2 TEVAR.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in Zone 2 frequently necessitates coverage of the isolated left vertebral artery (ILVA), a congenital vascular anomaly, to ensure adequate proximal sealing. However, the clinical requirement of ILVA revascularization remains uncertain. Thus, this study aimed to compare the outcomes between ILVA coverage and fenestration during Zone 2 TEVAR. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical records of patients with ILVA who underwent Zone 2 TEVAR between September 2010 and August 2023. Patients were divided into two groups: Coverage Group (n = 23) and Fenestration Group (n = 33). Baseline characteristics, surgical outcomes, and changes in left and right vertebral artery diameters pre- and postoperatively were compared. Continuous variables were compared using Student's Results: The overall cohort had a mean age of 54.48 ± 10.31 years, with 89.29% of participants male and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 25.88 ± 3.5 kg/m Conclusions: Fenestration is associated with a lower incidence of postoperative ILVA diameter reduction compared with direct coverage during Zone 2 TEVAR. These findings highlight the potential benefit of ILVA revascularization and underscore the need for further validation in larger studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.