ReviewAmerican journal of human genetics2026
Implications of the FDA's new plausible mechanism framework for the development of a personalized in vivo prime editing platform.
Review in American journal of human genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- CRISPR in clinical oncology: translational advances from molecular diagnostics to therapeutics.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Amelioration of the neurological phenotype in PKU mouse model emphasizes the potential of base editing for metabolic diseases.Molecular therapy. Advances · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In February 2026, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published a draft guidance on a new plausible mechanism framework for the development and approval of individualized therapies for genetic conditions. Here, we report initial proof-of-concept studies supporting a customizable prime editing platform geared to the treatment of 7 urea cycle disorders (UCDs) and other liver-centered disorders, as well as the outcome of a formal meeting with the FDA to discuss the use of the platform in an "umbrella-of-umbrellas" clinical trial including subjects with any of the 7 UCDs. We anticipate our findings will be of interest to academic investigators and industry sponsors who wish to pursue expeditious FDA approvals of therapies for ultra-rare diseases using the plausible mechanism framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.