ArticleCell reports. Medicine2026
A metabolite-augmented FIB-4 machine learning panel achieves superior liver fibrosis staging in chronic liver disease.
Article in Cell reports. Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate, non-invasive liver fibrosis detection is essential for chronic liver disease management, particularly with rising metabolic dysfunction-associated liver disease (MASLD) and chronic hepatitis B (CHB). While the Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index is widely used, its performance for advanced fibrosis is limited. We develop Met-FIB using metabolomics and machine learning, integrating FIB-4 parameters (age, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and platelet count) with tyrosine and taurocholic acid identified in a CHB discovery cohort (n = 3,251). Validation includes one CHB cohort (n = 729) and two MASLD cohorts (n = 149, n = 155). Met-FIB outperforms FIB-4, FibroScan, and other serum markers across all fibrosis stages. In CHB, Met-FIB achieves 96.3% rule-out sensitivity and 85.4% rule-in specificity for significant fibrosis, with rule-in specificity reaching 98.6% and 98.8% for advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis. In MASLD, corresponding values are 93.9% and 90.2% for significant fibrosis, with >97.9% specificity for late-stage disease. Met-FIB demonstrates clinical utility for non-invasive fibrosis staging across diverse etiologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.