ArticleInvestigative radiology2026
Signal Enhancement of Gadoquatrane for Standard Clinical Pulse Sequences: A Phantom Study in Human Plasma.
Article in Investigative radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe purpose of this phantom study in human plasma was to characterize the signal enhancement properties of gadoquatrane under clinically relevant, highly standardized conditions in comparison to gadobutrol. Gadoquatrane is a novel high-relaxivity, extracellular macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) currently in clinical development at a dose of 0.01 mmol/kg body weight (corresponding to 0.04 mmol Gd/kg). MATERIALS AND
methodsThree GBCA-dilution series in human plasma were prepared: 2 series with equimolar Gd concentrations (0-10 mmol Gd/mL) for gadoquatrane (0.4 mol Gd/L) and gadobutrol (1.0 mol Gd/L), and 1 series with 60% lower Gd concentrations for gadoquatrane (12 samples/series). For each series, signal intensity versus Gd concentration profiles were obtained using standard T1-weighted MRI pulse sequences at 1.5 T. In addition, the impact of sequence parameters was investigated (repetition and echo time for spin-echo sequences; flip angle for gradient-echo sequences).
resultsThe signal enhancement achieved with the 2 GBCAs depended on the Gd concentration and the pulse sequence. For all sequences tested, almost superimposable signal intensity profiles were found for gadobutrol and gadoquatrane, with 60% lower Gd concentrations for gadoquatrane. Sequence parameter variations affected both GBCAs in the same way. The optimal flip angles were equal for gadobutrol and gadoquatrane (60% reduced).
conclusionsThe signal intensity profiles obtained in human plasma using standard clinical pulse sequences were almost superimposable for gadobutrol and gadoquatrane at 60% lower Gd concentrations. For clinical use, this means that the same pulse sequence parameters can be used for both GBCAs and that, essentially, the same signal enhancement can be expected from gadoquatrane at a dose of 0.04 mmol Gd/kg body weight as from gadobutrol at a dose of 0.1 mmol Gd/kg.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.