Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41923545›Full record

ArticleAnnals of laboratory medicine2026

Comparison of Bruker Biotyper Sirius, VITEK MS PRIME, and ASTA MicroIDSys MALDI-TOF MS Systems for

Bosung Park, Eunsang Suh, Eun Jeong Won, Tae Yeul Kim, Hee Jae Huh, Heungsup Sung, Mi-Na Kim

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of laboratory medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bosung ParkDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3666-8534
Eunsang SuhDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5133-6207
Eun Jeong WonDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8750-4257
Tae Yeul KimDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6405-5305
Hee Jae HuhDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8999-7561
Heungsup SungDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6062-4451
Mi-Na KimDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6589-5122

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Accurate and rapid identification of Methods: We analyzed 51 Results: After initial on-plate extraction, correct identification rates were 86.4%, 88.1%, and 69.5% for Sirius, PRIME, and ASTA, respectively. After repeat on-plate extraction, ASTA accuracy increased to 81.4% ( Conclusions: Sirius and PRIME demonstrated robust performance for

Indexed as

CryptococcusFungal ProteinsSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationCryptococcus neoformansHumansFungal ProteinsASTA MicroIDSysMALDI-TOF MSOn-plate extractionSiriusVITEK MS

Identifiers

PMID41923545
PMCPMC13662489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.