Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41923436›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2026

Preclinical

Aaron Omon, Meng Gu, Ralph Hurd, Kirk Riemer, Frank Hanley, Daniel Spielman

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aaron OmonDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Meng GuDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Ralph HurdDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Kirk RiemerDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Frank HanleyDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Daniel SpielmanDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0838-6967

Funding

Neurometabolic Outcomes of Different Cardiopulmonary Bypass StrategiesR01HL152757 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HANLEY, FRANK, SPIELMAN, DANIEL M · 2021 to 2024
$2.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL152757NIH HHS R01 HL152757
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCongenital heart disease affects 1% of US births, with some infants requiring cardiothoracic surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Optimal surgical parameters to minimize neuronal injury are unknown. We used serial

methods2-week-old piglets (N = 26) were placed in a 3 T MRI to study brain metabolism during CPB. Dynamic single-voxel

resultsA temperature-dependent NAA/tCr

conclusions

Indexed as

BrainCardiopulmonary BypassNeuronsProton Magnetic Resonance SpectroscopyAnimalsAnimals, NewbornAspartic AcidCreatineFemalePhosphocreatineSwineAspartic AcidCreatineN-acetylaspartatePhosphocreatineantegrade cerebral perfusionblood glucosebrain metabolismcardiopulmonary bypasscirculatory arrestdeep hypothermic circulatory arrestmagnetic resonance spectroscopyneonatal

Identifiers

PMID41923436
PMCPMC13269183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.