ArticleClinical transplantation and research2026
Reporting patterns of renal failure associated with immunosuppressant combinations following liver transplantation: a retrospective analysis.
Article in Clinical transplantation and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Immunosuppressant regimens are essential for preventing graft rejection in liver transplant recipients; however, their use has also been associated with increased reporting of renal failure. This study evaluated disproportional reporting patterns of renal failure associated with immunosuppressant combinations using the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Methods: A retrospective signal detection analysis was conducted using FAERS data from 2004 (Q1) to 2024 (Q2). Five exposure groups were defined for each core calcineurin inhibitor (tacrolimus or cyclosporine), administered as monotherapy or combined with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), prednisone, or everolimus. Reporting odds ratios (RORs) and adjusted RORs were calculated for renal failure outcomes, using the corresponding monotherapy as the reference. Regional subgroup and sensitivity analyses were also performed. Results: Adding MMF to tacrolimus- or cyclosporine-based regimens was associated with lower disproportional reporting of renal failure versus monotherapy. Regional analyses revealed variability in reporting patterns: MMF-containing regimens showed lower disproportionality in Europe, whereas in North America, the tacrolimus-MMF-prednisone combination demonstrated lower reporting signals. In Latin America and Asia, overall reporting proportions of renal failure were lower, and additional agents did not consistently reduce signals. Sensitivity analyses across renal failure-related preferred terms yielded consistent patterns. Conclusions: These findings reflect disproportional reporting patterns rather than causal or protective effects and should be interpreted cautiously given inherent FAERS limitations, including missing clinical details and lack of denominator data. The results are hypothesis-generating and warrant further investigation using real-world clinical datasets to better characterize renal safety across immunosuppressant combinations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.