Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41923313›Full record

SynthesisJournal of animal science2026

A systematic review of the efficacy of complementary colostrum, milk, and oral nutritional and dietary solutions on the health, growth, and gut health of suckling piglets.

Diana Luise, Barbara Polimeni, Paolo Trevisi

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Effects of Chlorogenic Acid-RichAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Diana LuiseDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, Viale Giuseppe Fanin, 46, Bologna, 40127, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7864-7822
Barbara PolimeniDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, Viale Giuseppe Fanin, 46, Bologna, 40127, Italy.ORCID 0009-0009-5779-4204
Paolo TrevisiDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, Viale Giuseppe Fanin, 46, Bologna, 40127, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7019-6828

Funding

BOOSTcolostrum J53D23018670001BOOSTcolostrum P2022ZTYLS-CUPNextGenerationEU-Piano Nazionale di Ripresa e Resilienza (PNRR)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pre-weaning mortality has increased with the adoption of highly prolific sow genetics. To mitigate these limitations, alternative strategies have been investigated, including supplementation with heterologous or artificial colostrum or milk (derived from different species, eg, bovine, ovine) and the use of nutritional additives, such as proteins, pre/probiotics, vitamins, and bioactive compounds to replicate the protective functions of porcine colostrum and milk. This review aims to summarize and critically evaluate the effects of early dietary interventions, including cross-species colostrum, milk replacers, and oral functional additives, on suckling piglets, focusing on survival, growth performance, and gut health-related parameters, including intestinal function, immune and oxidative status parameters, and microbial establishment. The systematic literature search was conducted using Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, employing the search "Colostrum" AND "piglets" OR "pig"; "Milk" AND "piglets" OR "pig" until 2023. A total of 7,251 articles were identified, and 62 were retained after filtering. The selected articles were categorized into three databases: 1) Colostrum, including trials with oral colostrum interventions and swine colostrum as a control group (14 articles); 2) Milk, focusing on milk-based oral interventions with a swine colostrum or milk as control group (12 articles); and 3) Oral strategies, comprising additive-based oral interventions (eg., prebiotics, probiotics, amino acids, and combinations) with controls receiving only colostrum, milk, or water (41 articles). Although many of these alternatives partially fulfill the nutritional requirements of neonatal piglets, results across studies remain inconsistent and controversial. Milk replacers closely approximate the composition of porcine colostrum and can improve piglet growth, including low-birth-weight piglets, while also exerting positive effects on intestinal structure, immune system, and intestinal microbiota. Additional benefits may be obtained through the supplementation of other bioactive compounds (amino acids, probiotics), although the optimal dosage and timing of administration remain to be determined. To date, no substitute has proven fully capable of replicating the complex and unique functional properties of porcine colostrum. This highlights the need for continued research to develop more effective interventions that can support piglet survival and performance.

Indexed as

Animal FeedColostrumDietMilkAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsAnimals, SucklingDietary SupplementsFemaleSwineargininelow body weightoligosaccharideprobioticsow reared

Identifiers

PMID41923313
PMCPMC13293068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.