ArticleHelicobacter
Helicobacter pylori Eradication Primary Care First-Line Prescriptions: Data From 200,000 Patients in a Real-World Cohort.
Article in Helicobacter. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Synthesis, Antibacterial Evaluation, and Chemometric Profiling of a Vanilloid-Based Compounds Library Active AgainstAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHelicobacter pylori is a common infection primarily managed in primary care. Assessing real-world practices and guideline adherence is crucial for treatment optimisation. The study aims to assess current H. pylori management strategies using data from BIFAP, a Spanish primary care database. MATERIALS AND
methodsCohort study including patients aged ≥ 18 with recorded H. pylori infection (2003-2023) and corresponding treatment prescriptions. Infection cases were identified using ICD-9/10 and SNOMED-CT codes. Treatment patterns were based on Spanish and European guidelines. First-line treatment prescriptions were compared between primary (BIFAP) and specialized (European Registry, Hp-EuReg) care.
resultsA total of 211,972 H. pylori-infected subjects were identified. Over the study period (20 years), the predominant first-line treatments were: bismuth quadruple therapy including a proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) plus a single capsule containing bismuth-tetracycline-metronidazole (36%); PPI + clarithromycin-amoxicillin (30%); and PPI + clarithromycin-amoxicillin-metronidazole (26%). Single-capsule bismuth quadruple therapy was the most common in patients aged 18-64 and those with obesity, chronic kidney disease, or smokers, while PPI + clarithromycin-amoxicillin was more common in those aged ≥ 65 or with peptic ulcers. Since 2013, PPI + clarithromycin-amoxicillin use by general practitioners and gastroenterologists decreased, though it remained above 10% in primary care at study end. PPI + clarithromycin-amoxicillin-metronidazole increased since 2015, with higher use in specialized care (40%) vs. primary care (30%). In 2023, single-capsule bismuth quadruple therapy was the most prescribed regimen in both settings, accounting for ~60% of prescriptions.
conclusionsPrimary care H. pylori treatments are varied, with single-capsule bismuth quadruple therapy most prescribed. Guidelines are followed, but adoption is slower in primary than in specialized care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.