ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2026
Treatment-related benefit and satisfaction in patients with Fabry disease in France: insight into patients' expectations and preferences from the prospective, non-interventional SATIS-Fab study.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04043273 (Treatment-related Benefit and Satisfaction in Fabry Patients. Insight in Patients Expectations and Preferences), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Treatment-related Benefit and Satisfaction in Fabry Patients. Insight in Patients Expectations and Preferences (SATIS-Fab)
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFabry disease (FD) is a progressive X-linked lysosomal disorder caused by GLA variants resulting in deficient α-galactosidase A enzyme activity, glycolipid accumulation, and multisystemic dysfunction. Approved treatments include intravenous enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) or the oral small-molecule chaperone migalastat.
methodsSATIS-Fab was a 2-year, prospective, longitudinal, multicentre, non-interventional, non-comparative study conducted in France. Enrolled patients were aged ≥ 16 years, had FD (migalastat-amenable variant), and were receiving/planned to initiate ERT or migalastat. The primary endpoint during follow-up (6-monthly assessments) was the FD-specific Patient Benefit Index (PBI), derived from the French-validated Patient Needs Questionnaire-Fabry and corresponding Patient Benefit Questionnaire. Secondary endpoints included the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication-9 (TSQM-9).
resultsOf 69 enrolled patients (mean age 51.7 years; 63.8% male; 60.9% late-onset phenotype), 39/69 were already receiving migalastat and 17/69 ERT. At the baseline visit, 82.6% (57/69) were prescribed migalastat and 17.4% (12/69) ERT. Twelve-month PBI remained stable (mean [SD] 2.36 [0.91] and 2.49 [0.94] at months 12 [n = 55] and 24 [n = 47], respectively; P = 0.173). Mean (SD) 24-month PBI was 2.43 (0.92), and 92.3% of patients (48/52) had a clinically relevant treatment benefit (24-month PBI ≥ 1). Correlations between 24-month PBI and TSQM-9 effectiveness, convenience, and global satisfaction domain scores were 0.63, 0.43, and 0.61, respectively (all P < 0.0001; post hoc analysis); these results confirm the external validity of the PBI. Ten patients switched from ERT to migalastat at/after the baseline visit and before month 24; none switched from migalastat to ERT. For those with available data (n = 8), mean (SD) 12-month PBI increased by 1.14 (0.96) after switching (P = 0.008) and TSQM-9 domain scores improved (all P < 0.05).
conclusionsPatients with FD, mostly receiving migalastat, reported a relatively high level of treatment benefit that remained stable over 2 years. Switching from ERT to migalastat was associated with significantly increased treatment benefit. The FD-specific PBI could support shared decision making about treatment.
trial registrationNCT04043273 (registered 31 July 2019).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.