ArticleBMC medical education2026
Career choice processes in occupational therapy, speech and language therapy, and physiotherapy: a scoping review.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAllied health professions, including occupational therapy, speech and language therapy, and physiotherapy, are integral to modern healthcare systems. Despite their importance, these fields face ongoing challenges in recruiting and retaining qualified professionals. A better understanding of the factors influencing career choice in these professions is essential for developing targeted workforce strategies. This scoping review aims to systematically identify, categorise, and synthesise influencing factors and underlying theoretical frameworks related to career choice processes in these fields, with particular attention to the German context.
methodsA scoping review was conducted in December 2024 across the databases PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, ERIC, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library. Eligible sources included quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods studies, as well as relevant grey literature in English or German. Two reviewers independently screened and selected studies based on predefined criteria. Data were extracted and thematically analysed using qualitative coding in MAXQDA.
resultsOf 1,852 records screened, 37 studies were included. Thematic analysis identified four main categories of influencing factors: (1) personal factors (demographic characteristics, personality traits, altruism, fields of interest, qualifications, knowledge); (2) social influences (professionals, service users); (3) exposure to the profession (internships and part-time jobs, experience as a patient, media, advisor, events); and (4) professional factors (working conditions, scope of practice). Most studies originated from Australia, the USA, and the UK; none were conducted in Germany.
conclusionsCareer choice in occupational therapy, speech and language therapy, and physiotherapy results from a multifaceted interplay of individual, social, and structural factors. The absence of studies from Germany highlights a substantial research gap and underscores the need for context-specific empirical investigation. These findings offer a foundation for developing evidence-based recruitment and retention strategies and highlight the necessity for future research in the specific context of the German healthcare and educational system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.