Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41923231›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2026

Thematic characteristics and research hot-spots of China's healthy aging policy: topic modeling study.

Jian'an Han, Xinru Li, Bohai Zhang, Benli Xue, Lingli Yang, Yanming Liao, Xinyi Zhang, Chichen Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jian'an HanSchool of Health Management, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xinru LiSchool of Health Management, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Bohai ZhangSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Benli XueSchool of Health Management, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Lingli YangSchool of Nursing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yanming LiaoSchool of Health Management, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xinyi ZhangSchool of Health Management, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Chichen ZhangSchool of Health Management, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China. zhangchichen@sina.com.

Funding

Guangdong Philosophy and Social Science Foundation Regular Project GD25YGG14Guangdong Provincial Medical Science and Technology Research Fund B2025151the National Natural Science Foundation of China 72274091
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChina faces unprecedented aging challenges, with its population aged 60 + projected to exceed 310 million by 2024. To address this, China integrated “healthy aging” into national strategies like the Healthy China 2030 initiative. However, a systematic analysis of policy themes and research hot-spots was lacking. This study aims to fill this gap by examining China’s healthy aging policies and academic focus areas from 2016 to 2025.

objectiveTo identify core thematic characteristics of China’s healthy aging policies and research hot-spots using topic modeling and content analysis, revealing national priorities and informing global aging governance.

methodsThis study employed a mixed-methods approach to analyze China’s healthy aging policies and research trends. First, 14 national policy documents (2016–2025) were collected from official Chinese government portals, while 101 research papers were systematically retrieved and screened from four major Chinese academic databases. Policy texts underwent latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) topic modeling using Python 3.11.8: after custom dictionary optimization and TF-IDF-weighted (term frequency-inverse document frequency) stop-word filtering, grid search identified the optimal topic count (K = 4) via perplexity-coherence metrics, followed by 50 iterations for model convergence. Simultaneously, research papers were analyzed through content analysis on the DiVoMiner® platform, using a predefined coding framework (4 primary themes, 15 sub-dimensions). Coding reliability was ensured via Holsti’s coefficient (0.93) derived from dual human-AI coder consensus.

resultsThe LDA model revealed four core policy themes: Topic 0 (Comprehensive Health Service System and Elderly Health Monitoring, 11.4% strength), Topic 1 (Whole-Life-Cycle Health Management and Chronic Disease Prevention, 25.7%), Topic 2 (Development of Age-Friendly Industries and Public Services in Urban-Rural Contexts, 46.3%, highest strength), and Topic 3 (Innovative Models for Integrated Medical and Elderly Care and Elderly Health Services, 16.6%). Temporal analysis showed policy evolution from single-topic dominance (2016: Topic 0 at 99.9%) to multi-topic integration. Content analysis of research papers identified divergent hot spots: “Health Promotion Strategies” (102 occurrences, 33.3% focused on community support) and “Policy Support” (83 occurrences, 74.7% national-level) dominated the literature, whereas “Health Management Technologies” were significantly underrepresented (15 occurrences, 66.7% categorized as “other” uncategorized tech). Critical gaps included minimal focus on family support (1.2%) and underutilized technologies.

conclusionsChina’s healthy aging framework combines strategic governance, cultural resources, and socioeconomic integration. Strengths include tiered interventions for diverse needs and urban-rural synergy, though rural health equity and technology adoption require optimization. Future research should prioritize longitudinal policy evaluations, cross-nation comparisons, especially with developing economies, and participatory elderly-centered designs. China’s model offers a cost-effective paradigm for global aging societies.

Indexed as

Health PolicyHealthy AgingChinaHumansHealth equityHealthy agingIntegrated medical-elderly careLDA topic modelingPolicy text analysisSilver economy

Identifiers

PMID41923231
PMCPMC13169789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.