ArticleBMC bioinformatics2026
MOLT: multi-object and lineage tracking in 2D and 3D biomedical time-series imaging.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tracking object instances, such as individual living cells or molecular accumulations, and their behavior is a common challenge in 2D and 3D volumetric biomedical imaging. Combined with dynamic environments caused by unintentional camera misalignment over longitudinal studies, deformable tissues, and morphologically changing instances, object tracking poses a challenging and time-consuming task in biomedical settings. This paper presents a robust 2D and 3D object tracker designed to handle such scenarios, ensuring consistent identification of physical objects over time. Our method combines image registration with a novel graph-based conflict resolution algorithm for object and lineage tracking, handling camera misalignment and object movement. The algorithm accommodates morphological changes including splitting, merging, growing, shrinking, emerging, and vanishing object instances. This training-free framework serves as a post-processing step after instance segmentation, making it compatible with many tracking-by-detection approaches and generalist segmentation models such as CellPose-SAM. The proposed framework provides a flexible, training-free, and interpretable solution for long-term tracking in neuroscience, cell biology, and medical imaging. Our method is evaluated in two biomedical contexts: tracking 3D Beta-amyloid accumulations in in-vivo two-photon fluorescence imaging and monitoring cell movement and proliferation in 2D cultures. On 2D cell-tracking datasets, MOLT achieves TAR scores of (92.618–96.145%) on CellPose-SAM annotations, outperforming established TrackMate baselines on two of three datasets. For 3D Beta-amyloid plaque tracking, MOLT achieves a Lineage Reconstruction score (LNR) of 83.394%, demonstrating accurate lineage reconstruction under complex splitting and merging dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.