ArticleBMC women's health2026
A multiple instance learning framework for estradiol level classification in TCT whole slide images.
Article in BMC women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveEstradiol level assessment is critical for the management of gynecological endocrine disorders. The current gold standard, serum hormone testing, is limited by its invasiveness, variability due to physiological fluctuations, and limited accessibility in primary care settings. This study investigates the feasibility of using Multiple Instance Learning (MIL) algorithms for classification of estradiol levels using routinely collected Thinprep Cytologic Test (TCT) whole slide images (WSIs), which adds no additional procedure when TCT is already indicated.
methodsThis retrospective study included 1,171 patient samples with paired TCT images and serum estradiol data. Samples were categorized into positive (n = 713) and negative (n = 458) groups using a threshold of 40 pg/mL. Each WSI was treated as a “bag,” with extracted image patches constituting “instances.” Under a weakly supervised MIL model, the binary classification performance of four models (AB-MIL, DS-MIL, Trans-MIL, and DTFD-MIL) for estradiol levels was systematically evaluated. A nested cross-validation with a fixed test set was used. We further conducted confounder analyses, multi-threshold validation, decision curve analysis, and a cross-batch generalizability test.
resultsAB-MIL achieved the highest performance: test accuracy 0.706 ± 0.048, macro-AUC 0.747 ± 0.024, macro-F1 0.692 ± 0.043. PR-AUC was 0.812. At the 0.5 operating point, sensitivity was 83.9%, specificity 64.1%. The combined clinical‑image model (age + FSH+AB‑MIL) achieved an AUC of 0.787 (NRI = 0.123, IDI = 0.0976). Multi-threshold (60,80,100 pg/mL) AUCs remained stable (0.679–0.710). Cross-batch testing revealed expected performance decay (AUC 0.611–0.631).
conclusionThis exploratory study demonstrates the technical feasibility of using an MIL-based model to infer estradiol status from cervical cell morphology in TCT WSIs. The findings provide preliminary evidence that AI analysis of routine cytology images could serve as a potential screening adjunct tool. This work presents a methodological framework for future development of endocrine assessment using routinely collected TCT samples, pending further validation and refinement, to be potentially integrated with cervical cancer screening workflows for concurrent evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.