ArticleBMC neurology2026
Association of prophylactic mannitol administration with perihemorrhagic edema and long-term outcome in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage.
Article in BMC neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT03183167 (Universitätsklinikum Erlangen Cohort of Patients With Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Universitätsklinikum Erlangen Cohort of Patients With Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPerihemorrhagic edema (PHE) is an independent predictor of functional outcome after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Although smaller studies have shown an association between prolonged prophylactic mannitol administration (PPMA) and PHE volume reduction, its therapeutic effect remains unclear.
methodsWe included patients with spontaneous ICH from the UKER-ICH database. The primary outcome was defined as the change in PHE volume from admission to its maximum extent (PHE growth). We used linear regression models adjusted for peak ICH volume to estimate associations of PPMA with PHE, and multivariable logistic regression models to evaluate functional outcome (day-90; modified Rankin-Scale 4–6 = poor).
results826 patients were included. Ninety-five patients received mannitol. The treated patients had larger median peak ICH volumes (42 (IQR 19.2–70.4) vs. 11.7 (IQR 4.6–27.7) mL, p < 0.001). Linear regression demonstrated an association between PPMA and increased PHE growth and peak PHE volume (adjusted b = 6.2, 95%CI 2.16–10.63 and b = 8.4, 95%CI 3.16–13.6, respectively). After PS-matching (n = 116), the peak ICH volume was evenly distributed, while PPMA was associated with larger median peak PHE volumes (45.7 (IQR 24-78.2) vs. 35.2 (IQR 19.7–52.7) mL, p < 0.05) and growth (21.5 (IQR 9.2-42-8) vs. 11.9 (IQR 1.4–25.8) mL, p < 0.05). PPMA was associated with poor outcome (adjusted OR = 2.09, 95%CI 1.01-4.00; PS-matched cohort (n = 114): 45 (79%) vs. 36 (65%), p = 0.097 (trend)).
conclusionsWe found no association between PPMA and reduced PHE volume or improved outcomes, and cannot exclude potential harm. However, we also cannot exclude a potential benefit of short-term mannitol administration up to 72 h after onset in reducing PHE volume. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03183167 (2017-06-09)
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.