ArticleBMC plant biology2026
Adaptation of highland barley to drought stress: from phenotypic analysis to physiological and molecular mechanisms.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDrought severely limits crop growth and yield. Highland barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), a naturally stress-tolerant crop, serves as an ideal model for investigating the molecular and physiological mechanisms underlying plant drought adaptation.
resultsIn this study, two highland barley varieties, Xi-La 22 (XL22) and Zang-Qing 17 (ZQ17), with different degrees of drought tolerance, were used to investigate the mechanism of drought tolerance in highland barley. Compared with XL22, ZQ17 exhibited significant reductions in the biomass and root/shoot ratio, and the increase in ion leakage and malondialdehyde content under drought stress. Natural drought experiment further confirmed that ZQ17 had a higher fatality rate and water loss rate than XL22, indicating that XL22 had higher drought tolerance. Drought induced significant increase in H2O2 and O2.− levels in both barley varieties, especially in ZQ17. Moreover, compared with XL22, more distribution of H2O2 in chloroplasts of ZQ17 might lead to greater degradation of photosynthetic protein complexes (PSI, PSII, LHCII trimers), thereby reducing photosynthetic capacity. The activities of glutathione reductase and glutathione peroxidase and content of reduced glutathione and ascorbate acid were markedly higher in XL22 compared with ZQ17 under drought stress. RNA-seq results showed many genes related to reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging, osmotic adjustment (LEA, HSP, aquaporins), hormone signaling and transcription factors (TFs) were specifically up-regulated in XL22. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) further identified key modules and clarified core hub genes in XL22, mainly including genes in bZIP, AP2/ERF, bHLH transcription factor (TF) families and ABA signaling pathway, which help maintain high ROS scavenging capacity, root/shoot ratio and photosynthetic performance.
conclusionThis study reveals that drought-tolerant highland barley maintains antioxidant activity, photosynthetic complex integrity, hormone signaling, and drought-responsive TF activation, providing insights for barley germplasm screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.