ArticleBMC health services research2026
A qualitative study of emergency physicians' perspective on the emergency journey of older patients.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe rapid increase in the global population of older adults has created a growing workload demand on emergency services as the older population poses special clinical and workflow difficulties for staff compared to younger patients. The present study is a qualitative one that examines emergency physicians with respect to their experiences with older patients throughout their emergency service care. METHODOLOGY: We interviewed 16 emergency medicine specialists employed by a tertiary hospital by means of a semi-structured questionnaire and then analyzed the obtained data using thematic content analysis.
resultsWe detected four main themes: (1) the equilibrium between patient age and frailty during triage decisions (2), difficulties surrounding patient communication and history (information) taken from the patients (3), diagnostic versatility, and (4) management and successive stages of patient care. According to physicians, frailty was more important in determining the urgency of a patient’s clinical presentation than his/her age. Difficulties in communication complicated physical examination, and atypical signs and symptoms commonly caused more tests and imaging modalities to be ordered, likely stemming from concerns surrounding patient safety and medico-legal liability. Treatments for older adults were administered on an individual basis, taking into consideration potential organ dysfunction, tailoring medication and fluid doses for individual patients. Hospitalization rates were higher among older patients when a lack of social support was perceived. Although the results of the present study stress the important upsides of the decision-making process in acute care, they also determined important shortcomings regarding the planning of transition-of-care and long-term management plans for the older patients.
conclusionsThe findings of the present study suggest that there is a need to establish emergency medicine practices benefiting aged people, communication protocols with a structured hierarchy, collaboration between different disciplines, and political action to take social factors into consideration while implementing clinical decision-making processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.