ArticleBMC psychology2026
Network analysis of suicidal tendency and mental health symptoms in college students: a gender-differences comparison.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSuicide is a major global public health concern, particularly among university students, who exhibit higher rates than their non-student peers. Although gender disparities in suicide rates are well documented, the underlying network structure of suicidal tendencies and comorbid psychological symptoms across genders remains insufficiently understood.
methodsPsychometric network analysis was conducted to examine the interrelations between suicidal tendencies and core psychological symptoms among 1,021 vocational college students (488 males, 533 females). Gaussian Graphical Models were estimated using the EBICglasso method to identify central and bridge nodes, and Network Comparison Tests were used to evaluate gender differences in network structure, global metrics, and edge weights.
resultsGender-specific networks revealed distinct patterns. Suicidal preparation emerged as a highly central symptom and stronger bridge node among females, whereas hopelessness was a key bridge factor among males. Global strength (p = 0.131) did not differ significantly between genders, whereas global expected influence (p = 0.007) showed significant gender differences. Several nodes and edges also demonstrated gender-specific patterns.
conclusionsDepression emerged as a pivotal core symptom, and suicidal preparation acted as a crucial bridge linking psychological symptoms to suicide risk among vocational college students. Significant gender differences were observed in symptom centrality, bridge functions, and specific symptom–symptom interactions. Females appeared more vulnerable through pathways involving suicidal preparation, whereas males were more affected by hopelessness. These findings underscore the need for gender-tailored suicide prevention strategies targeting these distinct network mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.