ArticleParasites & vectors2026
Relative proportion and contrasting host preference of Culex pipiens biotypes across Europe.
Article in Parasites & vectors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe primary vector of West Nile virus (WNV) in Europe, Culex pipiens, has two morphologically identical but behaviorally and genetically distinct biotypes, here referred to as Pipiens and Molestus. Pipiens and Molestus, and their hybrids, are differentially distributed across Europe and display variable patterns of blood-feeding on birds and humans across the continent, but whether host choice correlates with host preference is unclear.
methodsSamples of mosquitoes were collected and subsequently biotyped using real-time PCR, following which the relative proportions of each biotype and the hybrids was recorded and their host preference analyzed using a two-choice trapping assay. Each trapping assay consisted of two BG-Sentinel type 2 traps, which were baited with CO
resultsThe relative proportions of Molestus and hybrids were higher in Greece than in the northern locations, while Pipiens remained the dominant biotype across all trapping locations. In Greece, the host preference of Pipiens and Molestus was for avian and human odors, respectively, whereas the host preference was reversed in the Netherlands and Switzerland. The hybrids were opportunistic in host preference regardless of trapping location.
conclusionsThe relative proportions of Pipiens and Molestus and their hybrids vary across Europe. The observed variance in host preference, ranging from opportunistic to weakly ornithophilic for Pipiens, from ornithophilic to mildly anthropophillic for Molestus and opportunistic for hybrids-depending on latitude-may have an impact on WNV transmission. This study highlights the discrepancy between host choice and host preference, and the efficacy of the synthetic host odor blends for surveilling the relative proportion and host preference of Cx. pipiens. This methodology provides a framework and the tools required for a more accurate assessment of vectorial capacity and prediction of WNV outbreaks, and may be used to understand the genetic mechanisms regulating host preference.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.