ArticleTrials2026
Standard Therapy versus Plasmalyte in Children with Dengue Shock Syndrome (SPLID trial): a study protocol for an open-labeled randomized control trial.
Article in Trials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIntravenous fluid resuscitation is the first-line therapy in the management of dengue shock syndrome (DSS), a severe complication of dengue fever characterized by vascular leakage and organ dysfunction. However, the choice of intravenous fluids for resuscitation in DSS remains contentious. Evidence is lacking with regard to standard therapy, like normal saline (NS) and Ringer lactate (RL), versus newer balanced crystalloids like Plasmalyte (PL) for resuscitation of DSS.
methodsThis study is a three-arm, prospective, open-label, parallel-group randomized clinical trial (RCT) to be conducted at a tertiary care hospital in north India over 36 months. We will recruit 135 children aged 2 months to 18 years, admitted with DSS who fulfill the eligibility criteria as per the WHO classification. The participants will be randomized to receive NS, or RL or PL in a 1:1:1 assignment. The primary outcome is a ≥5 mmol/L increase in serum chloride within 48 h post-randomization. The secondary outcomes include changes in acid-base status, hospital stay, need for colloid bolus, new-onset acute kidney injury (AKI), organ dysfunction, and mortality. AKI and organ dysfunction will be defined as per KDIGO criteria and Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction 2 score (PELOD-2), respectively. Any serious adverse event occurring during the course of the trial will be reported to the ethics committee and the monitoring committee within 24 h. Both intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses will be conducted. DISCUSSION: DSS initially requires prompt fluid resuscitation with crystalloids. NS in large volumes may lead to hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis. RL, containing lactate as a buffer, is contraindicated in children with compromised liver function due to their reduced ability to metabolize lactate. PL, a balanced crystalloid, is isotonic with a chloride concentration similar to that of plasma. Thus, the RCT aims to determine the change in serum chloride between standard treatment vs. PL within 48 h of fluid resuscitation and to compare the change in acid-base status, hospital stay, new-onset AKI, organ dysfunction, and mortality in children with DSS.
trial registrationThe SPLID trial has been registered prospectively with the Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI) registry no. CTRI/2023/11/060213 [Registered on 23/11/2023].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.