Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41923096›Full record

ReviewCritical care (London, England)2026

The "respiratory envelope", an aviation-inspired framework for patient tailored mechanical ventilation.

Christiaan L Meuwese, Eline Oppersma, Peter Somhorst, Leo Heunks, Joris A Melkert, Annemijn H Jonkman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christiaan L MeuweseDepartment of Intensive Care Adults, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. c.meuwese@erasmusmc.nl.
Eline OppersmaCardiovascular & Respiratory Physiology, Faculty of Science & Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Peter SomhorstDepartment of Intensive Care Adults, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Leo HeunksDepartment of Intensive Care, Radboud University Medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Joris A MelkertFaculty of Aerospace Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
Annemijn H JonkmanDepartment of Intensive Care Adults, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contemporary mechanical ventilation strategies in ARDS rely on lung-protective ventilation approaches that typically utilize separate static variables/settings (e.g., tidal volumes, plateau pressure) and cut-off values. This approach fails to capture complex patient dynamics. Increasing efforts have focused on the interactions between different parameters (e.g. mechanical power, driving pressure); however, these only accommodate a limited number of interactions and do not integrate the complexity of patient-specific, severity-dependent and time-varying thresholds for “safe” mechanical ventilation. In aviation, the “flight envelope” concept revolutionized flight safety by defining flexible, context-dependent boundaries as a function of multiple dimensions (e.g. flight speed, altitude, (dynamic) loads on the aircraft) within which an aircraft can operate. When a new aircraft is developed, its operational safety envelope is determined analytically. Calculations are quickly followed by flight simulations and flight testing, beginning from a known safe point within the envelope and gradually carefully exploring its boundaries to characterize its limits. Inspired by this aviation approach, we propose the “respiratory envelope” framework for mechanical ventilation: a conceptual framework that allows for the incorporation of multiple (time-dependent) dimensions and integrates interactions between ventilator variables/settings and patient characteristics. Just as flight envelopes informed the development of automated envelope protection algorithms and autopilot systems, a similar framework could be applied in clinical settings to simulate real-time “safety zones” based on continuously monitored, yet underutilized, physiological data, such as in digital twins.

Indexed as

AircraftAviationRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory Distress SyndromeHumansTidal Volume

Identifiers

PMID41923096
PMCPMC13188779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.