ReviewCritical care (London, England)2026
The "respiratory envelope", an aviation-inspired framework for patient tailored mechanical ventilation.
Review in Critical care (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Contemporary mechanical ventilation strategies in ARDS rely on lung-protective ventilation approaches that typically utilize separate static variables/settings (e.g., tidal volumes, plateau pressure) and cut-off values. This approach fails to capture complex patient dynamics. Increasing efforts have focused on the interactions between different parameters (e.g. mechanical power, driving pressure); however, these only accommodate a limited number of interactions and do not integrate the complexity of patient-specific, severity-dependent and time-varying thresholds for “safe” mechanical ventilation. In aviation, the “flight envelope” concept revolutionized flight safety by defining flexible, context-dependent boundaries as a function of multiple dimensions (e.g. flight speed, altitude, (dynamic) loads on the aircraft) within which an aircraft can operate. When a new aircraft is developed, its operational safety envelope is determined analytically. Calculations are quickly followed by flight simulations and flight testing, beginning from a known safe point within the envelope and gradually carefully exploring its boundaries to characterize its limits. Inspired by this aviation approach, we propose the “respiratory envelope” framework for mechanical ventilation: a conceptual framework that allows for the incorporation of multiple (time-dependent) dimensions and integrates interactions between ventilator variables/settings and patient characteristics. Just as flight envelopes informed the development of automated envelope protection algorithms and autopilot systems, a similar framework could be applied in clinical settings to simulate real-time “safety zones” based on continuously monitored, yet underutilized, physiological data, such as in digital twins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.