ArticleBMC medical education2026
Assessment of prescribing competencies among final year medical students in Gezira State, Sudan.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPrescribing medications is a critical part of medical practice, yet evidence indicates prevalent issues with errors and inadequate training among clinicians, particularly junior doctors. Newly graduated doctors in countries like Sudan are often expected to write most hospital prescriptions and prescribe multiple times per day on hospital drug charts. This study investigated the prescribing competencies of final-year medical students in Gezira State, Sudan, aiming to identify gaps in knowledge, skills, and students’ self- assessment of their preparedness.
methodsA descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in 2022. Four medical schools (two governmental, two private) participated, and 162 of 213 eligible students completed the assessment (76% response rate). The validated assessment tool included 55 multiple-choice questions (weighted to 60 points), covering pharmacology, clinical pharmacology, and pharmacotherapy (CPT). Student performance was classified using a criterion-referenced system: Excellent (50–60), Very Good (40–49), Good (30–39), Poor (< 30).
resultsThe study revealed a significant deficiency in essential prescribing competencies. Only 17% of students achieved a score of 50% or above in the assessment. The average clinical pharmacology and therapeutics (CPT) knowledge score of students was 22 (± 7.5) out of 60. The students’ performance was lowest in the domains of drug-drug interactions, drug-disease interactions, and identification of prescribing errors with students scoring an average percent 18, 31, and 18%, respectively. Students obtained an average percent score of 36, 40, and 48% regarding drug indications, drug-related side effects, and mechanism of action, respectively. Many students (48%) expressed low confidence in their prescribing skills and dissatisfaction with the amount and quality of undergraduate teaching in (CPT).
conclusionOur results suggest that undergraduate teaching of CPT is inadequate in these schools potentially leading to unsafe prescribing. We recommend that CPT curricula should be reviewed and developed under the supervision of qualified clinical pharmacologists to achieve competency-based outcomes. Moreover, we recommend that medical schools should test prescribing competencies of their students prior to graduation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.